Vote via email-Voting will be open until midnight on December 31
As per the request of the community at Public Information Centre #4, City staff has provided an opportunity to vote via email on the overall Community Option for the brow lands. Preliminary information on approximate unit numbers, density, population and traffic analysis has been provided for each of the options.
***Please note that numbers and figures are approximate and based on certain assumptions. No formal technical analysis has been undertaken.***
If you did not attend the December 13, 2007 meeting and you would like to vote for the overall community development option, please follow the steps below:
- Thoroughly review the different community development options.
- Read the summary and review the analysis provided for the different options. Please be advised that Option 3 has been broken down into two different scenarios (please indicate A or B when voting).
- Send an email to Kirsten McCauley?with your name, address and your overall Preferred Option indicated (Please note that if your name and address are not provided your vote will not count).
- If you wish, you may also fill out a comment sheet providing additional information on your choice or the Modified Secondary Planning Public Consultation Process.
If you attended Public Information Centre #4, please do not vote again. Voting will be open until midnight on December 31, 2007. Staff will tally the votes and post the overall preferred community option on the project website the first week of January. Thank you for participating in this process.
|
Option #1 – No Development
- 0 Units
- Density of 0 units per hectare
- 2006/2011 Population Projection – 0 Persons
- No traffic impact
|
?
|
|
Option #2 – Limited Development
- 25 single detached units
- Density of 3.73 units per hectare
- 2006 Population Projection ? 68.17 persons
- 2011 Population Projection ? 66.25 persons
- Traffic Analysis:
- AM Peak – 19 Trips
- PM Peak – 25 Trips
|
?
|
|
Option #3 – Medium-Low Development
Option 2A:
- 20 Townhouses
- 214 Apartment units?
- = 234 total units
- Density of 34.93 units per hectare
- 2006 Population Projection ? 424.8 persons
- 2011 Population Projection ? 414.96 persons
- Traffic Analysis:
- AM Peak – 82 Trips
- PM Peak – 92 Trips
Option 3B:
- 20 Townhouses
- 34 Apartment units in new building
- 68 Apartment units in existing buildings
- = 122 total units
- Density of 12.34 units per hectare
- 2006 Population Projection ? 233.28 persons
- 2011 Population Projection ? 227.92 persons
- Traffic Analysis:
- AM Peak -?50 Trips
- PM Peak -?62 Trips???
|
?
|
|
Option #4 – Mixed-Use Medium Development
- 5 Single Detached Dwellings along Scenic Drive
- 19 Townhouses
- 193 new Apartment units
- 44 Apartment units on the upper floors of Long and Bisby and the CCC (with ground floor for mixed use)
- = 256 total units + jobs
- Density of 38.2 units per hectare
- 2006 Population Projection ? 485.08 persons
- 2011 Population Projection ? 473.76 persons
- Traffic Analysis:
- AM Peak – 108 Trips
- PM Peak – 124 Trips
|

|
|
Option #5?- Most Development?
18 Townhouses along Scenic Drive
389 Apartment units in new buildings
62 Apartment units in existing buildings
= 469 total units
Density of 70 units per hectare
2006 Population Projection ? 824.18 persons
2011 Population Projection ? 804.99 persons
Traffic Analysis:
AM Peak – 181 Trips
PM Peak – 209 Trips
|
 |
Tagged:
brow,
chedoke browlands,
city staff,
community option,
consultation process,
densities,
density,
developers,
development option,
development options,
lands,
participant,
participation,
plans,
population,
population projection,
preferred community,
public consultation,
public information centre,
scenarios,
scenic,
townhouses,
traffic,
traffic impact